Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Organizational Culture, Diversity, and Decision-Making - Study Help
  

  Organizational Culture, Diversity, and Decision-Making  

1. List all of the cultural challenges posed by Disney’s expansion into Europe. (Side of matrix.)

2. Next, list the variables that influenced these challenges. (Top of matrix.)

3. Decide on a score (1-5) for each of these challenges according to the relative importance of the factors. Multiply each of these scores by 2 to find the weighted scores for each option/factor combination.


Euro Disneyland


 This week you were introduced to several decision-making tools in the course content. Using the Decision Matrix Analysis (https://expertprogrammanagement.com/2017/09/decision-matrix-analysis/ ) along with the Decision Matrix Analysis video
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2HtqQjyt5s ), make the following decisions relative to the case study about Euro Disneyland (p. 262):  

The first section of your paper should be an explanation of this process and how you decided on each of the factors in the matrix.

1. List all of the cultural challenges posed by Disney’s expansion into Europe. (Side of matrix.)

2. Next, list the variables that influenced these challenges. (Top of matrix.)

3. Decide on a score (1-5) for each of these challenges according to the relative importance of the factors. Multiply each of these scores by 2 to find the weighted scores for each option/factor combination.

Next, respond to the following questions in the rest of your essay: 

1. Using Hofstede’s four cultural dimensions as a point of reference noted in the case, what are some of the main cultural differences between the United States and France? 

2. In managing its Euro Disneyland operations, what are three mistakes that the company made? Explain your response with examples.

3. As a conclusion, reflect on your overall thoughts on this case. 

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

· Be 5-6 pages in length, which does not include the title page, abstract, or required reference page, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.

· Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.

· Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.

· Review the  
Critical Thinking Grading Rubric
 
Critical Thinking Grading Rubric – Alternative Formats
  to see how you will be graded for this assignment.


Euro Disneyland


 This week you were introduced to several decision-making tools in the course content. Using the Decision Matrix Analysis (https://expertprogrammanagement.com/2017/09/decision-matrix-analysis/ ) along with the Decision Matrix Analysis video
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2HtqQjyt5s ), make the following decisions relative to the case study about Euro Disneyland (p. 262):  

The first section of your paper should be an explanation of this process and how you decided on each of the factors in the matrix.

1. List all of the cultural challenges posed by Disney’s expansion into Europe. (Side of matrix.)

2. Next, list the variables that influenced these challenges. (Top of matrix.)

3. Decide on a score (1-5) for each of these challenges according to the relative importance of the factors. Multiply each of these scores by 2 to find the weighted scores for each option/factor combination.

Next, respond to the following questions in the rest of your essay: 

1. Using Hofstede’s four cultural dimensions as a point of reference noted in the case, what are some of the main cultural differences between the United States and France? 

2. In managing its Euro Disneyland operations, what are three mistakes that the company made? Explain your response with examples.

3. As a conclusion, reflect on your overall thoughts on this case. 

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

· Be 5-6 pages in length, which does not include the title page, abstract, or required reference page, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.

· Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.

· Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.

· Review the  
Critical Thinking Grading Rubric
 
Critical Thinking Grading Rubric – Alternative Formats
  to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

MGT672

Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 6

Exceeds Expectation

Meets Expectation

Below Expectation

Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

21-25 Points

16-20 Points

11-15 Points

6-10 Points

Requirements

Exceeds Expectation -Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Meets Expectation – Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Below Expectation – Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Limited Evidence – Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

21-25 Points

16-20 Points

11-15 Points

6-10 Points

Content

Exceeds Expectation – Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.

Meets Expectation – Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.

Below Expectation – Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.

Limited Evidence – Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.

25-30 Points

19-24 Points

13-18 Points

7-12 Points

Analysis

Exceeds Expectation – Provides strong thought, insight, and use of the Decision Matrix, as well as other concepts and applications.

Meets Expectation – Provides adequate thought, insight, and use of the Decision Matrix, as well as other concepts and applications.

Below Expectation – Provides poor thought, insight, and use of the Decision Matrix, as well as other concepts and applications.

Limited Evidence – Provides little or no thought, thought, insight, and use of the Decision Matrix, as well as other concepts and applications.

13-15 Points

10-12 Points

7-9 Points

4-6 Points

Sources

Exceeds Expectation – Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Meets Expectation – Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Below Expectation – Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Limited Evidence – Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.


Mechanics and Writing

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

1-2 Points

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

Exceeds Expectation – Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Meets Expectation – Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.

Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Below Expectation – Project is poorly organized and written, and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment.

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development, and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Limited Evidence – Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations and references.

Total points possible = 100

error: Content is protected !!